On February 20, 2026, Cushman & Wakefield announced what it calls the first data-driven tool in commercial real estate designed to measure AI’s growing influence on property markets. They named it the AI Impact Barometer. It tracks AI adoption, capital investment, labor market shifts, and infrastructure demand across sectors including data centers, industrial facilities, and office space, and distills those indicators into “AI momentum scores” showing the direction and intensity of AI-related change.
Global Chief Economist Kevin Thorpe framed it this way: “AI is no longer a future concept. It is becoming a structural force in the economy. Our AI Impact Barometer is designed to cut through the noise and give clients a clear, data-driven way to see where AI is driving growth, where it is creating pressure, and how those forces are showing up in the built environment.”
That is a strong claim. And at BestCRE, strong claims get scored.
We built the 9AI Framework specifically to evaluate tools like this — not to summarize press releases, but to ask whether a tool actually delivers what it promises to the practitioners who rely on it. The AI Impact Barometer is, at its core, a market analytics and data tool, which puts it squarely inside Sector 6 of the 20 Best CRE Sectors. So here is our first take.
What the AI Impact Barometer Actually Is
The Barometer is described as the first output from Cushman & Wakefield’s Think Tank, with plans to update the model regularly through 2026. A public webinar was held on February 23. Principal Economist and Head of Investor Insights Abby Corbett summarized the intent: “We want to give clients a practical, credible way to track how one of the biggest economic shifts of our time is playing out in real estate, and what to do about it.”
The early findings point to three asset class stories that practitioners should be paying close attention to:
Data Centers: Pre-commitment rates for data center projects under construction continue to trend positively even as new investment floods the sector. Pre-leasing rates across the data center market have climbed well above historical norms as tenants rush to secure power and space. Power availability, not capital, is the binding constraint. BestCRE’s full analysis of why power is the new location in CRE data centers covers this in depth.
Industrial: Bulk distribution centers built since 2020 typically provide more than 20 percent higher electrical supply per square foot than older facilities — a specification difference that is becoming a leasing advantage as warehouse automation accelerates. Vintage matters more than it used to. BestCRE’s analysis of the electrical spec premium in industrial real estate examines this bifurcation in detail.
Office: Polarization is widening and widening fast. Leasing and investment in prime properties located in tech innovation hubs have improved, while obsolescence risk is rising sharply for lower-quality space. This is not a recovery story for the asset class. It is a bifurcation story.
Running It Through the 9AI Framework
The 9AI Framework evaluates every tool in the CRE AI landscape across nine standardized dimensions. Here is how the AI Impact Barometer holds up on first review — with the caveat that a fuller scoring will follow once the methodology documentation is public and the model has produced multiple update cycles.
1. CRE Relevance
Strong. The Barometer is explicitly designed for commercial real estate decision-making. The asset class framing — data centers, industrial, office — maps directly to how practitioners think and allocate capital. The inclusion of labor market shifts and infrastructure demand signals is genuinely useful context that generic macroeconomic tools miss.
2. Data Quality & Sources
Unclear — and that matters. The press release describes “AI momentum scores” but does not specify what underlying data feeds the model, how frequently data is refreshed, or how proprietary the inputs are versus aggregated public signals. For a tool making claims about being the first data-driven barometer of its kind, the methodology transparency bar needs to be higher. We will update this score when the Think Tank publishes its methodology documentation.
3. Ease of Adoption
Unknown at this stage. The tool has been announced but its delivery format has not been fully detailed. Is this a dashboard? A quarterly PDF? An API feed? Ease of adoption depends entirely on how practitioners actually access and use the outputs. The webinar format suggests the current iteration leans toward thought leadership rather than a self-service analytical tool.
4. Output Accuracy
Promising but unverified. The industrial finding — that post-2020 bulk distribution centers carry more than 20 percent higher electrical supply per square foot — is a specific, testable claim. The data center pre-commitment trend aligns with what third-party observers have noted. But “AI momentum scores” that distill broad macro forces into a single directional indicator carry inherent simplification risk. Confidence intervals matter. Directional accuracy matters more than point estimates in a market moving this fast.
5. Integration & Workflow Fit
Not yet demonstrated. The most valuable market analytics tools in CRE are those that connect to downstream decision workflows — underwriting models, acquisition pipelines, portfolio reporting systems. A standalone barometer that requires practitioners to manually translate macro signals into transaction-level decisions is useful but not yet integrated. This is the dimension with the most room to develop. For practitioners building their own AI workflow integration, Claude Skills offer a concrete starting point for automating tasks like lease abstraction without enterprise software overhead.
6. Pricing Transparency
Free at point of access, but not without cost. This is a client-facing tool from a global brokerage. The implicit price is the relationship — C&W produces the Barometer to deepen advisory relationships with institutional clients who then route capital markets transactions through the firm. That is not a criticism. It is context. Users should understand the incentive structure: a barometer produced by a brokerage has a structural interest in framing AI as a demand driver for the properties its advisors sell and lease.
7. Support & Reliability
Institutional backing is real. Cushman & Wakefield is a publicly traded global firm with deep research infrastructure. The Think Tank has produced credible work historically. The commitment to regular updates through 2026 is meaningful. What remains to be seen is whether the update cadence holds when market narratives become less favorable to the AI demand story.
8. Innovation & Roadmap
Positioned well for iteration. Describing this as a “first step in a broader initiative” signals that C&W intends to build on it. The inclusion of labor market data alongside real estate metrics is an interesting methodological choice that could yield genuinely differentiated insights if the model matures. The roadmap question is whether this evolves into a practitioner-grade analytical tool or remains a polished institutional marketing asset.
9. Market Reputation
Too early to score, but the announcement landed well. Coverage across financial and real estate media was immediate. The C&W brand carries weight with institutional audiences. CEO Michelle MacKay’s assertion that fears of AI displacing commercial brokerage roles are “significantly exaggerated” will resonate with the firm’s advisor base — though that claim deserves its own analysis rather than acceptance at face value.
The Question BestCRE Is Asking That the Press Release Isn’t
Every major brokerage has a financial interest in the narrative that AI is a structural demand driver for commercial real estate. Data centers need power infrastructure. Industrial facilities need automation-ready specs. Office space near tech hubs commands premium rents. All of that is true. But it is also true that a firm advising clients on where to deploy capital benefits when those clients believe the market is moving in a direction that requires immediate action.
BestCRE is not suggesting the AI Impact Barometer is compromised by that incentive. We are noting that the incentive exists, and that practitioners deserve an independent layer of analysis sitting above the brokerage-produced research.
That is what this site is built to provide.
JLL, CBRE, Colliers, and others will almost certainly release their own versions of an AI market measurement tool within the next twelve months. When they do, BestCRE will evaluate each one through the same framework, without a brokerage relationship on the line.
What to Watch on February 23 and Beyond
The C&W public webinar scheduled for February 23 is the next data point. Watch for specifics on methodology — particularly how the “AI momentum scores” are constructed, which data inputs are proprietary versus public, and whether the tool is moving toward a self-service format. Those answers will determine whether this deserves a stronger score on Data Quality and Integration when BestCRE publishes its full analysis.
For now, the AI Impact Barometer earns credit for being first. The harder question — whether it becomes the best — is one BestCRE will continue to track.
BestCRE exists to map commercial real estate AI honestly — the platforms worth paying for, the ones you can replicate yourself, and the market forces shaping where capital is moving. Coverage spans 20 sectors and is evaluated through the 9AI Framework. If you’re deploying capital, advising clients, or building in CRE, this is the resource built for you.