Archilogic is a spatial data platform for corporate real estate, workplace, facilities, and PropTech teams that need consistent digital floor plans across a building portfolio. Its central proposition is straightforward: replace scattered CAD drawings, PDFs, and manually maintained polygons with a structured record of walls, rooms, desks, doors, and other spatial elements. This changes the CRE workflow at the point where physical space becomes operational data. Instead of preparing a different plan for each booking, occupancy, compliance, or workplace application, the owner can maintain one record and distribute it to connected systems.
The product is CRE-adjacent rather than a complete real estate management suite. It does not replace an IWMS, lease administration platform, workplace booking application, architectural authoring package, or sensor system. Archilogic supplies the spatial foundation those products often require. Its Space Graph represents building elements as semantically related data, while browser editing, version history, comparison, and rollback give internal teams a controlled way to maintain that information without assigning every routine change to a CAD specialist.
That distinction matters for buyers. Floor plan digitization can look like a commodity service until a portfolio has multiple drawing standards, recurring office changes, several workplace applications, and inconsistent room identifiers. Archilogic addresses the ongoing data management problem, not merely the initial conversion. Its GraphQL API, Floor Plan Engine SDK, integration catalog, and MCP Server indicate a platform intended for both enterprise operators and software developers. Microsoft Places is the most consequential named relationship for workplace teams because Archilogic positions itself as an official partner that can prepare and maintain spatial data for a Places deployment.
BestCRE analysis: Archilogic is most compelling when spatial inconsistency is already obstructing a larger workplace technology program. Its value is less obvious for an owner with a small, stable portfolio or a team that only needs occasional drawings. Buyers should also separate technical promise from verified operating results. The vendor says leading enterprises use the platform and refers to Fortune 500 customers, but it does not publish a customer count, portfolio volume, conversion accuracy rate, or broad set of quantified outcomes. The product deserves serious consideration, subject to a representative pilot and contractual data quality standards.
What Archilogic Does and How It Works
Archilogic begins with building plans and converts their contents into structured spatial objects. Rather than treating a floor as one static image, the platform identifies elements such as walls, doors, rooms, desks, and assets, then associates those elements through its Space Graph. Programs, names, areas, capacities, and relationships can become queryable attributes. This model supports portfolio questions that are cumbersome with files alone, such as finding meeting spaces above a specified capacity or identifying floors containing a particular space type. The resulting data can also drive interactive two-dimensional and three-dimensional floor plan experiences. Buyers should confirm supported source formats, required source quality, conversion responsibilities, exception handling, and validation procedures during procurement because the vendor does not publish a universal accuracy rate.
Once a floor is represented in the platform, authorized users can edit it through a browser. This reduces dependence on a CAD license for routine workplace changes such as room naming, desk configuration, or program updates. Versioning, change comparison, and rollback support governance when multiple teams touch the same record. Archilogic also calculates rentable and usable measurements and describes support for BOMA-compliant area calculations. It can be configured to automate checks related to internal design standards or requirements such as ADA rules. These capabilities are useful, but buyers should not treat automated output as professional certification. Measurement conventions, boundary assumptions, local code interpretation, and source geometry still require review by qualified personnel.
The distribution layer is as important as the editing layer. Applications can query spatial records through a GraphQL API, while developers can use the JavaScript or TypeScript Floor Plan Engine SDK to embed interactive plans in websites and products. Archilogic also exposes the Space Graph to AI tools through an MCP Server, giving agents a structured interface instead of forcing them to interpret drawing files. Named connections include Microsoft Places, Kadence, Serraview, Freespace, NORNORM, UMA, AVI-SPL, Smart Core, HqO, ServiceNow, Slack, IWMS, IoT, occupancy, and CAFM use cases. Integration depth is likely to vary, so buyers should distinguish packaged synchronization from supported exports, partner implementations, and custom API work.
9AI Framework: Dimension by Dimension Analysis
CRE Relevance: 8/10
Archilogic earns an 8 for CRE relevance because its core data model addresses a persistent building operations problem: turning floor plans into maintainable information that workplace, facilities, measurement, and occupancy systems can use. Room boundaries, desks, doors, program classifications, area calculations, and floor relationships are directly applicable to corporate real estate workflows. The platform is particularly relevant to occupiers managing office portfolios and technology programs involving Microsoft Places, booking, sensors, or an IWMS. It stops short of a higher score because it is not a complete CRE operating system. It does not appear to provide lease administration, transaction management, property accounting, construction management, or architectural documentation at the depth of specialist products. BestCRE analysis: Archilogic is a focused spatial infrastructure layer, valuable within CRE but usually purchased as part of a broader stack.
Data Quality and Sources: 8/10
Archilogic earns an 8 for data quality. Its graph-based model gives spatial elements defined identities, attributes, and relationships rather than leaving information trapped in drawings. Browser editing, version history, comparisons, and rollback create a stronger governance structure than exchanging revised PDFs among vendors. Recalculation after edits can also reduce the stale measurements that arise when geometry and schedules are maintained separately. However, structured storage does not guarantee correct source data or correct conversion. The vendor does not publish a general conversion accuracy percentage, an exception rate, or a standard service level for correcting defects. BestCRE analysis: the architecture supports high-quality data, but actual quality will depend on source drawings, classification rules, review procedures, and ownership after deployment. A pilot should test irregular geometry, room naming, openings, furniture, area boundaries, and cross-system identifiers.
Ease of Adoption: 7/10
Archilogic earns a 7 for ease of adoption. Browser-based editing lowers the barrier for routine plan maintenance, especially when the alternative requires a CAD license and specialist availability. Standardized records and packaged partner relationships may also shorten downstream application setup. Adoption is still more involved than purchasing a standalone visualization tool. A portfolio rollout requires gathering source files, resolving inconsistent labels, defining space taxonomies, confirming measurement rules, mapping identifiers, assigning permissions, and establishing who approves changes. Those activities cross real estate, facilities, IT, workplace, and sometimes external architecture teams. The vendor provides product documentation, support material, an academy, and video tutorials, but it does not publish typical implementation duration or staffing requirements. BestCRE analysis: users may find daily editing approachable after setup, while enterprise data preparation and governance remain meaningful implementation work.
Output Accuracy: 8/10
Archilogic earns an 8 for output accuracy because its outputs are derived from structured geometry and semantic records rather than separately maintained plan images and spreadsheets. Area measurements can be recomputed when geometry changes, and version controls make modifications traceable. This should improve consistency across connected applications when the same approved record supplies each destination. The ceiling is limited by the absence of publicly stated accuracy benchmarks and by the nature of spatial conversion itself. Ambiguous scans, outdated drawings, inconsistent boundaries, and incorrect room classifications can all produce precise-looking but wrong results. Claims involving BOMA measurement or ADA-related checks also require careful scoping because standards depend on defined methods and professional interpretation. BestCRE analysis: Archilogic offers a credible technical basis for accurate outputs, but buyers should require sample validation, tolerances, acceptance criteria, and a correction workflow in the contract.
Integration and Workflow Fit: 8/10
Archilogic earns an 8 for integration. The product is expressly designed to distribute spatial information into other systems, supported by a GraphQL API, an embeddable Floor Plan Engine SDK, and an MCP Server for AI applications. Microsoft Places is a notable workplace connection, while named relationships with Kadence, Serraview, Freespace, UMA, HqO, ServiceNow, and other PropTech providers broaden its potential role. This approach can reduce duplicate floor plan preparation when several applications need the same geometry and identifiers. Buyers should not assume that every catalog entry provides identical bidirectional synchronization, field coverage, monitoring, or support. Some deployments may depend on exports, partner services, or custom engineering. BestCRE analysis: the integration strategy is stronger than that of a closed floor plan editor, but procurement should document the precise connector, update direction, frequency, authentication, error handling, and ownership for every target system.
Pricing Transparency: 3/10
Archilogic earns a 3 for pricing transparency. The vendor does not publish standard subscription prices, conversion fees, minimum commitments, implementation charges, API limits, or enterprise support costs on the public site. Prospective customers are directed toward a demonstration and sales process, which makes it difficult to estimate total cost before sharing portfolio requirements. Enterprise spatial platforms often require configuration and variable processing, but that complexity does not eliminate the buyer’s need for comparable commercial information. Important questions include whether pricing is based on buildings, floors, area, users, records, API consumption, integrations, or conversion volume. Buyers should also ask about recurring storage, reprocessing, professional services, and data export costs. BestCRE analysis: the lack of published ranges materially weakens early-stage evaluation and makes a detailed, multi-year pricing schedule essential before selection.
Support and Reliability: 6/10
Archilogic earns a 6 for support. Public resources include product documentation, how-to guidance, release notes, an academy, video tutorials, and a status page, which provide a reasonable self-service foundation. Enterprise buyers can also request a demonstration, and implementation assistance is likely available, although the vendor does not publish detailed support plans, response targets, escalation paths, onboarding scope, or service availability commitments. That missing information matters because the platform may sit upstream of booking, workplace, sensor, and facilities applications. A spatial data issue can therefore propagate to several operational systems. BestCRE analysis: the available education appears credible, but public evidence is insufficient for a higher score. Buyers should obtain named support tiers, coverage hours, incident definitions, restoration targets, data correction responsibilities, implementation contacts, and escalation procedures, then ensure that responsibilities remain clear when an integration partner is also involved.
Innovation and Roadmap: 9/10
Archilogic earns a 9 for innovation. Modeling each building as a standardized, graph-based spatial record is more consequential than simply digitizing a drawing. It makes rooms, walls, desks, doors, and their relationships available to software queries, embedded applications, and AI agents. The combination of browser editing, portfolio queries, two-dimensional and three-dimensional representation, a developer SDK, GraphQL access, and an MCP Server shows a coherent product direction. It also addresses an emerging problem: AI applications cannot reliably reason over floor plans when space information remains scattered among PDFs, CAD files, and unrelated databases. BestCRE analysis: Archilogic is among the category’s more original infrastructure products because it treats spatial data as an enterprise record rather than a presentation artifact. The remaining question is operational proof, particularly whether customers can maintain semantic quality across large, frequently changing portfolios without heavy services.
Market Reputation: 7/10
Archilogic earns a 7 for market reputation. Its official Microsoft Places relationship provides meaningful validation, and its integration ecosystem includes recognizable workplace and facilities technology vendors. The company also states that leading enterprises and Fortune 500 organizations trust the platform. Those indicators support credibility with large occupiers, but public disclosure is not sufficient for a higher score. The vendor does not publish a customer count, retention rate, managed portfolio size, or enough detailed customer outcomes to independently assess adoption depth. It also does not disclose broad performance benchmarks that would let buyers compare implementations. BestCRE analysis: Archilogic has stronger enterprise signals than an unproven floor plan startup, but reputation should not substitute for references. Prospective customers should request conversations with comparable occupiers, ideally matching their portfolio scale, source file condition, geographic coverage, Microsoft environment, and intended downstream applications.
Who Should Use Archilogic
Archilogic best suits corporate real estate and workplace teams managing many office floors, especially when plans are duplicated across booking, occupancy, facilities, and employee experience systems. It is a strong candidate for organizations deploying Microsoft Places or replacing a manual process built around CAD files, PDFs, spreadsheets, and vendor-specific polygons. A portfolio with frequent restacks, inconsistent room identifiers, or several downstream applications has the clearest case. Buyers should have an executive owner for spatial data and an operating team prepared to maintain classifications, approvals, and integration mappings after the initial conversion.
PropTech vendors and internal development teams are another suitable audience. The Floor Plan Engine SDK, GraphQL API, and structured Space Graph can provide a spatial layer without requiring every application team to build its own geometry pipeline. Facilities teams that need auditable plan changes or regularly recomputed area measurements may also benefit. BestCRE analysis: the ideal customer views floor plans as shared operational data, not merely drawings. The strongest purchase case combines a defined integration program, measurable manual work today, and a commitment to data governance. A limited pilot should include representative source files and at least one production destination.
Who Should Not Use Archilogic
Archilogic is not the best first purchase for a small owner with a few stable buildings and no need to connect floor plans to operational software. In that setting, a conventional drawing repository, an architect’s CAD service, or a simpler workplace application may cover the requirement at lower organizational cost. Teams seeking architectural design authoring, detailed BIM coordination, rendering, construction documentation, lease accounting, or transaction management should use specialist products. Archilogic may feed those workflows, but it is not positioned as their replacement.
It is also a weak fit for buyers unwilling to establish ownership for spatial data. Converting plans once will not create a dependable system if moves, wall changes, room names, and equipment updates remain unmanaged. Organizations that require a fully priced, self-service purchase before engaging sales will find the commercial process opaque. BestCRE analysis: avoid buying Archilogic solely because AI readiness sounds strategic. Proceed only when there is a defined operational problem, named consuming systems, acceptance criteria, and a team responsible for maintaining the record.
Pricing and ROI Analysis
Archilogic does not publish standard pricing. Public information does not disclose subscription tiers, per-building or per-floor rates, digitization charges, implementation fees, API allowances, user limits, support packages, or minimum contract values. A buyer therefore needs a scoped proposal covering both initial conversion and recurring platform costs. The commercial schedule should identify every pricing driver, including source condition, number of floors, update volume, environments, integrations, developer access, training, and data exports. It should also state whether corrections to converted plans are included, how additional buildings are priced, and what happens to the data at contract termination.
BestCRE analysis: simple ROI math should begin with avoidable labor rather than an assumed property value increase. If a workplace team currently spends 120 staff hours each month preparing, reconciling, and redistributing floor plan updates, and the fully loaded labor cost is $75 per hour, the annual process cost is $108,000. If Archilogic reduces that work by half, the indicative labor benefit is $54,000 per year before implementation costs, software fees, or benefits from faster system launches. These figures are an illustrative analysis, not vendor claims. Buyers should replace every assumption with observed internal data and add measurable costs from drawing vendors, integration maintenance, booking errors, and delayed updates. The purchase is economically credible only if contracted total cost remains below a conservative, verified benefit.
Integration and CRE Tech Stack Fit
Archilogic fits best as a spatial data layer between source drawings and operational CRE applications. Microsoft Places is the clearest strategic connection for corporate workplace buyers. Other named ecosystem relationships cover booking, occupancy, sensors, furniture, employee experience, IWMS, IoT, and CAFM scenarios. The GraphQL API supports portfolio and floor queries, while the Floor Plan Engine SDK supports embedded interactive plans. An MCP Server extends access to compatible AI tools. This architecture can give several applications a shared definition of rooms, desks, capacities, and geometry.
Integration claims still require technical diligence. Buyers should ask which connectors are productized, which are partner-led, and which require custom work. They should map authoritative fields, record identifiers, synchronization direction, update frequency, failure notifications, and conflict resolution. Security review should cover authentication, permissions, logging, retention, and data residency. Archilogic states that it is GDPR and ISO 27001:2022 certified, but procurement teams should verify certificate scope and current documentation. BestCRE analysis: the platform can simplify a fragmented stack only when governance prevents connected systems from creating competing versions of spatial truth.
Competitive Landscape
The closest alternative depends on the actual job. Qbiq focuses on automated office planning and test fits, while TestFit emphasizes rapid feasibility and site planning. Autodesk Forma supports early-stage planning and environmental analysis, and Autodesk Revit remains the deeper authoring environment for BIM and architectural documentation. Those products are more appropriate when the primary task is generating or developing a design. Archilogic is differentiated by maintaining structured operational space data and distributing it to workplace applications after plans already exist.
OfficeSpace Software is a more direct option when the buyer primarily wants workplace management, booking, moves, and employee-facing functions in one application. Density and VergeSense approach the problem through occupancy intelligence and sensor-derived use patterns. Freespace also combines workplace operations and sensor-related capabilities. Archilogic can complement these products by supplying spatial structure, but some buyers may prefer a suite that owns both the plan and the daily workflow. Enscape is a visualization alternative for design teams, not a substitute for a spatial system of record.
BestCRE analysis: choose Archilogic when consistent plan data must serve multiple applications and remain controlled independently of any single workplace vendor. Choose qbiq or TestFit when rapid layout generation is the main requirement, Revit when detailed building authoring governs the process, and OfficeSpace when the immediate priority is a packaged workplace experience. Against its peer group, Archilogic ranks as a distinctive infrastructure choice with strong technical depth, but weaker pricing visibility and less public outcome evidence than buyers should expect for an enterprise standard.
The Bottom Line
Archilogic should make the shortlist for a large occupier that cannot trust, update, or distribute floor plan data consistently. Its graph model, browser editing, APIs, Microsoft Places relationship, and AI-oriented access form a credible spatial foundation. The purchase case is strongest when several workplace systems currently recreate the same plans or when a Places rollout is stalled by inconsistent building data.
Do not approve an enterprise rollout on positioning alone. Run a paid or contractually defined pilot using difficult, representative floors, then measure conversion defects, editing effort, synchronization reliability, and downstream usability. Require transparent multi-year pricing, data ownership terms, export rights, support commitments, and reference customers with comparable complexity. BestCRE analysis: Archilogic is a technically advanced product with real strategic value, but it earns the right to become a system of record only after proving accuracy, maintainability, and economics in the buyer’s own environment.
About BestCRE
BestCRE.com is the definitive authority on commercial real estate AI, analysis, and investment intelligence. Every article advances the platform’s mission to help CRE professionals identify, evaluate, and adopt the best tools and strategies in the industry. We benchmark platforms using the 9AI Framework so CRE leaders can compare tools with clear evidence. Explore the category map at 20 CRE sectors for deeper coverage across the CRE stack.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Archilogic?
Archilogic is a spatial data platform that converts building floor plans into structured, queryable records. It represents elements such as walls, rooms, doors, desks, and assets as connected data rather than leaving them inside CAD drawings or PDFs. Corporate real estate, workplace, facilities, and software teams can edit that record in a browser and distribute it to workplace applications, analytics tools, websites, and AI systems. The platform includes a Space Graph, a GraphQL API, an embeddable Floor Plan Engine SDK, and an MCP Server. It also supports area measurement and configurable compliance checks. Archilogic is not a full IWMS, BIM authoring package, booking platform, or lease administration system. It is best understood as the spatial foundation that can supply consistent floor and space information to those systems.
How does Archilogic compare with Revit, TestFit, and qbiq?
Archilogic serves a different stage of the space lifecycle. Revit is a detailed BIM authoring product used to design and document buildings. TestFit supports rapid feasibility and site planning, while qbiq emphasizes automated office layouts and test fits. Archilogic focuses on converting existing plans into an operational spatial record that can be maintained and shared across workplace technology. Its browser editor, semantic Space Graph, APIs, and integration model are intended to keep room and asset data useful after design work is complete. BestCRE analysis: use Revit when architects need detailed model authoring, TestFit or qbiq when layout generation is the main job, and Archilogic when multiple operational applications need one governed source of floor plan data. Some enterprises may use these products together rather than choose only one.
How much does Archilogic cost?
Archilogic does not publish standard prices, subscription tiers, implementation fees, conversion rates, API limits, or minimum commitments. Buyers must request a proposal based on their portfolio and intended deployment. Procurement should ask whether charges depend on floors, buildings, area, users, source file condition, conversions, integrations, API usage, or update frequency. The quote should separate initial digitization and configuration from recurring platform, support, and storage costs. It should also explain charges for corrections, new locations, training, custom integration work, and complete data export. BestCRE analysis: compare total contracted cost with documented labor spent maintaining plans, payments to external drawing vendors, duplicate integration work, and the operational cost of stale room data. Do not rely on an ROI estimate until a representative pilot establishes the actual effort saved.
Who should use Archilogic?
Archilogic is best suited to corporate real estate and workplace teams with a multi-building portfolio, frequent space changes, and several systems that consume floor plan information. It is particularly relevant to organizations implementing Microsoft Places, workplace booking, occupancy analytics, sensors, CAFM, or IWMS tools while struggling with inconsistent room names, identifiers, geometry, or area data. Internal software teams and PropTech vendors may also use its SDK and GraphQL API to add interactive plans without creating a spatial platform from scratch. BestCRE analysis: the ideal customer has a named spatial data owner, clear governance, and measurable costs caused by duplicated plan work. A small organization with stable space, no integrations, and only occasional drawing needs is less likely to justify the implementation and recurring platform expense.
Is Archilogic ready for AI-driven building operations?
Archilogic has a credible technical foundation for AI-driven use cases because its Space Graph gives building elements structured identities, attributes, and relationships. Its MCP Server allows compatible AI tools to query that information, while the GraphQL API supports application access. This is more suitable for machine reasoning than asking an AI system to interpret disconnected PDFs or CAD files each time. Potential uses include locating spaces that meet defined criteria, checking portfolio standards, retrieving capacities, or connecting spatial context with workplace workflows. BestCRE analysis: technical access does not make the underlying data complete or correct. Buyers should first establish classifications, permissions, update ownership, validation rules, and audit logs. Future AI value will depend less on the interface itself than on whether the organization maintains trustworthy spatial records over time.
Related Reviews
Compare Archilogic with other tools BestCRE has scored in the same category: Autodesk Forma, Enscape, TestFit. Explore more CRE AI tool reviews in our Best CRE AI Tools directory. For sector-specific analysis and market intelligence, visit our 20 CRE Sectors hub.
